Legal Opinion

Garner v. Meizel

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1913No. Civ. No. 1089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury and plaintiff had judgment. The judgment was entered on November 18, 1912, and, on the same day, at the request of attorney for defendant, the court ordered: “That a stay of execution be granted and that 30 days be granted for perfecting an appeal.” It further appears that thereafter, to wit, on the sixth day of December, 1912, defendant filed with the clerk of the said court a notice stating that defendant “desired and intended to appeal from the judgment of the said court in the said matter, and requesting a transcript of the testimony offered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Boling v. AltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Beets v. ChartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lent v. California Fruit Growers' Ass'n of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. MoncurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Chapuis v. PesanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API