Legal Opinion

Kindley v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 27, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from W. J. Adams, J., April Term, 1909, of Cum-BERLAND. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

In this case the plaintiff sought to recover the value of a diamond, which she alleged had been cut from its setting in one of her rings. The general allegation was that on 18 December, 1905, she purchased a through ticket from the city of Eayetteville to the city of Charlotte, which was issued by the defendant, the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, via Max-ton, to the place of her destination, in Charlotte. The ring, we will assume, for the purpose of deciding the question presented, and as the evidence tends to show, was in her trunk at the time the latter was delivered to the drayman…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doggett v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Chalk v. Charlotte, Columbia & Augusta RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Brick v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. RoachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  5. Kahn v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dickens v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Clott v. GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Perry v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Neece v. Richmond Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Clott v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API