Legal Opinion
Clott v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided January 5, 1971No. 7010DC495PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Plaintiff’s evidence, in addition to his own testimony, consisted of the adverse examinations of three employees of defendant: A. H. Howell, driver of the bus; Roy Wells, Superintendent of the Raleigh Division of Greyhound; and Walter J. Rackley, a part-time dispatcher relief for Greyhound who was on duty on the date in question. Plaintiff testified that he bought a ticket in Bushnell, Florida, with the final destination to be New York, New York, via Greyhound bus. He changed busses in Jacksonville, Florida, and carried the grip with him on the bus when he boarded in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Atkinson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Olan Mills, Inc. v. Cannon Aircraft Executive Terminal, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Smith v. SteppSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Freeman v. Myers Automobile Service Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Neece v. Richmond Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Beck v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Cole v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Flexlon Fabrics, Inc. v. Wicker Pick-Up & Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 13,625 Linda P. Horne, of the Estate of Benny Gerald Horne, and Benny Gerald Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Ac & S, Incorporated, a Pennsylvania Corporation Amchem Products, Incorporated the Celotex Corporation, Individually and as Successor Manufacturing Company, Philip Carey Corporation, Panacon Corporation, Glen Alden Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Briggs Manufacturing Company, and Smith and Kanzler, a Delaware Corporation C.E. Thurston & Sons, a Virginia Corporation Combustion Engineering, Incorporated Crown Cork & Seal Company, Incorporated, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Mundet Cork Corporation, a New York Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Flintkote Company, a Massachusetts Corporation Fireboard Corporation, Pabco Industrial Products Division, a Delawarecorporation Gaf Corporation, a Delaware Corporation W.R. Grace & Company, a Connecticut Corporation A.P. Greene Refractories Company Keene Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Keene Building Products Corporation, Keene Insulation Products Corporation, Ehret-Magnesia Manufacturing Company, Baldwin-Ehret-Hill, Incorporated, Baldwin-Hill Company, and Mundet Cork Corporation, a New York Corporation National Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation Owens-Illinois, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (Unarco), a Pennsylvania Corporation H.K. Porter Company, Incorporated, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Southern Asbestos, Carolina Asbestos, Thermoid and Tullman-Mccluskey, a Delaware Corporation Raymark Industries, Incorporated, Successor in Interest to Raybestos-Manhattan, Incorporated Rock Wool Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, an Alabama Corporation Turner & Newall, P.L.C., Individually and as Alter Ego of Keasby & Mattison United States Gypsum Company, Inc. Armstrong World Industries, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Armstrong Cork Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, General Refractories/grefco, Incorporated, U.S. Refractories Division, and Third Party v. Manville Corporation Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.