Legal Opinion

Chalk v. Charlotte, Columbia & Augusta Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Civil ActioN tor damages tried at Fall Term, 1880, of Mecklenburg Superior Court, before Seymov,r J. Judgment for plaintiffs, appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The action is to recover from the defendant company compensation for damages to one hundred barrels of flour which had been transported from St. Louis, and over its railroad from Augusta in Georgia to Charlotte in this state, and was a part destroyed and the rest injured by fire while on the city platform at the latter terminus before removal. The flour arrived at Charlotte on defendant’s train on the evening of April 14th, 1875, and was unloaded and put on the platform, the usual place for the deposit and delivery of freight to consignees, the next morning.

Notice of the arrival and of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knapp v. CurtisNew York Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farmers' Mercantile Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Basnight v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Tallassee Falls Manufacturing Co. v. Western RailwaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Hutchinson v. United States Express Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Alexander v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API