Jonas v. Home Mortgage Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlaRksoN, J.
The question involved: Was the lower court justified in directing a verdict that the plaintiffs recover nothing of the defendants? We think so.
This is an action in a court of equity, brought by plaintiffs to restrain defendants from selling their land under a deed of trust. Miller v. Dunn, 188 N. C., 397; Ripple v. Mortgage Corp., 193 N. C., 422; Pugh v. Scarboro, 200 N. C., 59; Clark v. Hood System, 200 N. C., 635.
Plaintiffs borrowed $7,000, made note and bond payable to bearer with 6% interest, on 15 August, 1927, and secured same by deed of trust on certain real estate. The plaintiffs made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ripple v. Mortgage & Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Planters National Bank of Virginia v. Wysong & Miles Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Waters v. GarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Bledsoe v. . Nixon .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Miller v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Bailey v. . InmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Buchanan v. Carolina Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Thomason v. . SwensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935