Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp. v. Okamoto Freighters Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
In this appeal, we are asked to ascertain the rights and responsibilities of several entities in relation to four separate contracts for the transportation of ten shipping containers from California to Japan. The district court, after addressing eight motions for summary judgment, a motion for reconsideration, and a motion to amend the judgment, held that Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation (“Yang Ming”) was entitled to summary judgment on its indemnity claim against Laufer Freight Systems, Inc. (“Laufer”) as a result of Laufer’s misdescription of the cargo.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Henley v. Marine TransportionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Allied Chemical International Corp. v. Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd BrasileiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Atari Corp. v. Ernst & WhinneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Starrag Starrag-Heckert Inc. v. Maersk, Inc., a New York Corporation Maersk Pacific Ltd., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Underwood Cotton Company, Inc. v. Hyundai Merchant Marine (America), Inc. Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Bigge Equipment Co. v. Maxpeed Int'l Transport Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Underwood Cotton Company, Inc. v. Hyundai Merchant Marine (America), Inc. Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- AGCS Marine Insurance Company v. Expeditors International Ocean IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.