Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1986No. CC C83-11-35425; CA A31588; SC S31726Published

1Opinion of the Court

721 P.2d 1375 (1986)

301 Or. 299

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on review,

v.

Joel Dean BENNETT, Respondent on review.

CC C83-11-35425; CA A31588; SC S31726.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted September 10, 1985.

Reassigned March 4, 1986.

Decided July 1, 1986.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on petition were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Jan Peter Londahl of Bennett, Londahl & McCandlish, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review.

JONES, Justice.

In this case, the state…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Peterson; Concurrence · Blackmun; Concurrence · Jones; Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API