Legal Opinion

Carten v. Loveless

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1941No. 13838PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The special plea, called by counsel for plaintiff in error a plea of res judicata, and designated by counsel for defendant in error a plea of estoppel, was stricken on motion. The correctness of this ruling raises only the question whether the plea was good in substance, since a motion to dismiss can reach no further than a general demurrer. The petition filed in DeKalb superior court sought to reform certain instruments and documents relating to a certain three-thousand-dollar loan made to McCollum, and particularly the deed given to secure the loan. It was prayed that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Laurens County Board of Education v. StanleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Glaze v. BogleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. O'Connor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Petkas v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. Salter v. HeysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Turner v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Nelson v. SmothersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API