Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Reville

The motions to dismiss the action explicitly limit their grounds to one proposition, to-wit: that the fact that two of the six judges of this court dissented in Reville v. Sullivan, 93 Ga. App. 23 (90 S. E. 2d 609), and that that fact in and of itself conclusively showed that the 'déféndant insurance company was not guilty of bad faith in refusing to settle the- case or of ■negligence' in trying it. A general demurrer or motion to dismiss in the nature of a general demurrer on the broad ground that the petition or count does not set forth a cause of action covers all reasons or grounds which…