Legal Opinion · Dissent

Young v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1955No. 33171Published

1DissentFinley, J.

(dissenting)—In Memmer v. Memmer, 27 Wn. (2d) 414, 419,178 P. (2d) 720, this court said:

“The question of allowance of alimony is one upon which there is no fixed rule, and each case must necessarily depend upon its own facts and circumstances.”

In the same case, the court also said:

“Where it appears that the trial court has fully considered all the facts and circumstances of the particular case, and has reached a solution thereof, the decision of that court will not ordinarily be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous.”

However, in Lockhart v. Lockhart, 145 Wash. 210, 259 Pac. 385 (decided in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. LockhartWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Mertens v. MertensWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Memmer v. MemmerWashington Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API