Legal Opinion

Agnew v. Omaha National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1903No. 12,317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Lee S. Estelle, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Kirkpatrick, C.

This is an error' proceeding prosecuted from a judgment of the district court for Douglas county in favor of the defendant beloiv, in an action wherein Frank A. Agnew, as receiver, was plaintiff, and the Omaha National Bank was defendant. Plaintiff’s petition alleged the corporate character of defendant under the laws of congress relating to national banks; that on January 5, 1894, Phil Stimmel and Prank T. Emerson were copartners in a seed growing business at Omaha and Waterloo, Nebraska; that at the date named the copartnership was the owner of chattel property of the value…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Loeb v. . WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Lodge v. TwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Ogden City v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Johnson v. ParrotteNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H. C. Smith Coal Co. v. FinleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hull v. BahenskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API