Legal Opinion

Hull v. Bahensky

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1976No. 40614PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

This is an action for rescission of a contract to purchase a laundromat business. The District Court first determined that rescission in equity should be denied but the cause retained for trial as an action at law. Upon later trial as an action at law, the District Court entered judgment against the defendant in the sum of $14,308.90; rescinded the contract; and ordered an accounting for the period of operation by the purchaser. The seller has appealed.

In the fall of 1972, the defendant, Clinton R. Bahensky, listed his laundromat business in Bellevue, Nebraska, with a realty company for sale…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. HynesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Nebraska Land Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Johnson v. RouecheNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Agnew v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Kuhlman v. CargileNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Global Credit Services, Inc. v. AMISUB (Saint Joseph Hospital), Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Barber v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Frontier Properties Corp. v. SwanbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API