Legal Opinion
Dancart Corp. v. St. Albans Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 2, 1984No. 83-060PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
The plaintiff, Dancart Corporation, is a New Hampshire manufacturing corporation. Over a period of several years, it ordered and purchased material from the defendant, St. Albans Rubber Co., Ltd., an English corporation. The plaintiff sent the orders by mail, telegraph or telex, and the record contains claims that by the time of this action the value of the various orders exceeded five hundred thousand dollars.
This action in contract is based on an order which the plaintiff sent to the defendant by telegraph. The defendant acknowledged the order on a form containing what is commonly, but not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Taylor v. Titan Midwest Construction Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1979
- Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 PropertiesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Cove-Craft Industries Inc. v. B. L. Armstrong Co. Ltd.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Summit Packaging Systems, Inc. v. Kenyon & KenyonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- City of Rochester v. CorpeningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Glick v. Chocorua Forestlands Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Strafford Technology, Inc. v. Camcar Division of Textron, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- In re Three Video Poker MachinesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.