Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Friedland

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 22, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01348Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KENNETH BURNHAM, et al., ) Case No. 1:21-cv-1348 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Judge Dan Aaron Polster ) v. ) ) CAROLYN A. FRIEDLAND, in her ) OPINION AND ORDER Official Capacity as a Judge/Actor of ) the State of Ohio, ) ) Defendant. ) Before the Court is the Complaint of Plaintiff Kenneth Burnham, et al., ECF Doc. 1. For the following reasons, the Court issues sua sponte, a dismissal of the Complaint. I. Background The Court has moved sua sponte pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Kenneth Burnham,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API