Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kim

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 2005PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Ken Kim, challenges the judgment of sentence entered on September 20, 2004, following a jury trial convicting him of first-degree murder, firearms not to be carried without a license, simple assault, terroristic threats, possessing instruments of crime, and attempting to elude a police officer. Appellant seeks a new trial by raising a number of claims on appeal. We affirm.

¶ 2 The relevant factual and procedural histories are as follows. On December 12, 2003, at approximately 10:14 a.m., Bensa-lem Township Police Officers responded to a reported shooting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. GwynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. Son TruongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. WallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. WillisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API