Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Hospelhorn
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 18, 1935No. [Nos. 46-51, April Term, 1935.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.
The Baltimore Trust Company, a Maryland corporation carrying on a state banking and trust business at Baltimore City, upon the passage of chapter 46 of Acts of 1933 came under the custody, management, and control of the Bank Commissioner of Maryland, and was not discharged from that custody until the appointment of a receiver in this case. On January 5th, 1935, the Bank Commissioner, who by virtue of the authority of Code, art. 11, sec. 9, and art. 11, sec. 71F (Acts 1933, ch. 46, sec. 1), was authorized to take possession of its property and business until it should resume business or its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boland v. AshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Brunswick T. Co. v. NAT. BK. OF BALTIMORESupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Poe v. Munich Re-Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Keighler v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Hughes v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Roland Electrical Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Taggart v. Wachter, Hoskins & Russel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Hospelhorn v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Sterling v. ReecherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Allender v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.