Legal Opinion
United States v. Pedro M. Diaz and Susana Diaz
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 8, 1982No. 81-5433PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
Convicted after a jury trial on 40 counts of falsifying records to conceal the practice of “overbleeding” donors at their plasmapheresis centers, defendants Pedro and Susana Diaz raised several points involving amendment of the indictment, jury instructions, materiality of false statements, refusal to acquit, and refusal to dismiss indictment. The keeping of false records being admitted, the ultimate contention on appeal is that such action did not violate 18 U.S. C.A. § 1001. For the reasons stated below we affirm the decision of the district court.
Background
The Diazes…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bryson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John E. CALHOON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Richard I. Berger, United States of America v. Richard I. BergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. John R. SwaimCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.