Legal Opinion
F. D. Rich Co., Incorporated v. Wilmington Housing Authority
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 10, 1968No. 16794_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FREEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, F. D. Rich Co., Incorporated, as the successful bidder was awarded the contract by defendant, Wilmington Housing Authority, to construct a public housing project in Wilmington, Delaware. The present diversity action seeks recovery on two claims arising from the contract. One is for the additional cost of $33,677.75 which resulted from the Authority’s requirement that plaintiff supply off-site or “borrow” fill material for areas in which plaintiff had contemplated using on-site fill material. The other claim is for additional expenses in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Wells Newton Co. v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
- Ace Stone, Inc. v. Township of WayneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Gasparini Excavating Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. City of DoverSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1973
- Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- State Highway Administration v. Greiner Engineering Sciences, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Owen Construction Co. v. Iowa State Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.