Legal Opinion
Meyberg v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1942No. L. A. 18010; L. A. 18011; L. A. 18012; L. A. 18013PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHENK, J. —
Mitchell S. Meyberg, Leonard J. Meyberg, Lorraine K. Meyberg, and James Meyberg separately petitioned for the writ of certiorari to review orders of the respondent court holding them in contempt of court. Fines imposed by the orders were paid under protest.
The payment of the fines under protest does not preclude a consideration of the question whether the respondent court has committed an excess of jurisdiction in making the orders presented for review. (Hume v. Superior Court, 17 Cal. (2d) 506 [110 Pac. (2d) 669].) The several petitions are consolidated for determination of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Hume v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Royal Consol. Mining Co. v. Royal Consol. Mines (Cal.) Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Harvey v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
- People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Klaus v. Hi-Shear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Fulreader v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Salgo v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Kauffman v. MeybergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.