Legal Opinion
Kauffman v. Meyberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 1943No. Civ. 14023; Civ. 14024PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Two appeals are consolidated for the purpose of decision. The first action is to enjoin the defendants from interfering with plaintiff’s right to vote 2,500 shares, or one-half of the capital stock of defendant corporation at an election of directors. The second action was to nullify the election of directors effected at the meeting of the stockholders to which plaintiff’s right to vote 2,500 shares was obstructed by defendants in spite of the restraining order issued at the inception of the first action. The two causes were tried together. Only one record was made. The court made findings…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Rockey v. VieuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- City of Los Angeles v. WattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. Casa Blanca Convalescent Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Mindenberg v. Carmel Film Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Fred J. Tabery and Leone M. Tabery, on Review v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, on ReviewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Howe v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Crane Valley Land Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.