Legal Opinion

Matula v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1986No. 85-309PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This is an appeal in an error proceeding brought by Floyd D. Matula to review an order of the personnel board of the City of Omaha, Nebraska. The personnel board affirmed the order of the chief of police suspending and discharging Matula from the Omaha Police Division. The district court affirmed the order of the personnel board. Matula has now appealed to this court.

In a proceeding in error, if the record shows that the administrative agency acted within its jurisdiction and there is some competent evidence to sustain its findings and order, the order must be affirmed. Caniglia v. City of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caniglia v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Best v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. BlancoNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Fieldston Garden Apartments, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hammann v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mathes v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cook v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. Ostwald v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Garland C. Cook v. Nebraska Public Power District Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Garland C. Cook v. Nebraska Public Power District, Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API