Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, District Judge.
This cause, arising under the Railway Labor Act, comes on to be heard upon complaint and answer, a hearing in open court having been had upon motion for preliminary injunction after the granting of a restraining order.
Inasmuch as both parties have been permitted to present exhaustive evidence and argument of the law which the court has heard and considered, the court is *345of the opinion that any additional evidence would be cumulative and repetitious.
Therefore, the court on its own motion chooses to make final disposition of the cause at this time instead of ruling upon…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- American Live Stock Commission Co. v. Chicago Live Stock ExchangeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- The Pullman Company v. Order or Railway Conductors and Brakemen, A. G. Wise and G. H. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, John B. Gordon Lodge No. 376 v. Southern Railway Company, Georgia Southern and Florida Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- REA Express, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship ClerksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Frederickson v. System Federation No. 114 of Railway Employees' DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Ralph E. Frederickson v. System Federation No. 114 Of Railway Employees' Department, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970