Legal Opinion

Stam v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 5, 1970No. 53610PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

We have here to decide several questions which arose in the trial of a rear-end automobile collision case.

Lawrence M. and Wilma Stam are husband and wife. For several years prior to the collision they operated a farm which they were buying on contract. For a time Mr. Stam also worked in a sale barn and had a trucking business. Until shortly before the collision, Mrs. Stam had not worked off the farm for several years, Their income went into a common bank account.

As of the time of the collision on February 25, 1966, both of the Stams had employment off the farm. Mr. Stam ran…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kisling v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Law Ex Rel. Law v. HemmingsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Daniels v. BloomquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Bridenstine v. Iowa City Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Gibbs Ex Rel. Gibbs v. WilmethSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. Estate of WhistlerTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Heick v. BaconSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. Campanella v. ZajicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Omaha Bank for Cooperatives v. Siouxland Cattle CooperativeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Ragee v. Archbold Ladder Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API