Legal Opinion

United States v. Lowell M. Birrell

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 4, 1972No. 293, Docket 72-1470PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from a con-' viction for perjury, defined and made punishable in 18 U.S.C. § 1621. The facts constituting the offense were hardly in dispute. The Government sought to establish, and the jury permissibly found, that on August 28, 1970, Lowell M. Birrell signed an affidavit before a notary public in which he swore, inter alia, “I am presently unemployed and I am not receiving any income.” This affidavit was filed with the clerk of this court in support of Birrell’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of new counsel under *115the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Martha Stewart and Peter BacanovicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Alphonse SiscaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Theron ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API