Legal Opinion
Garrett v. Faust
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 14, 1950No. 10128_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
John C. Faust and Cora Faust, his wife, two of the defendants in a civil action brought by T. A. Garrett and Elizabeth Garrett, his wife, in the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, have appealed from a judgment entered against them upon the verdict of a jury in the amount of $17,000.00. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of a third defendant, Railway Express Agency, Incorporated, by direction of the court and it is not involved in this appeal. Motions by the Fausts for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. were denied. 9 F.R.D. 482.
Mr. and Mrs.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Insurance Co. v. PiaggioSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Smith v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Vaughan v. MageeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
- Thorpe v. National City Bank of TampaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S, WDH Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- ID Security Systems Canada, Inc. v. Checkpoint Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Plumbers & Steamfitters Union, Local No. 598 v. W. C. DillionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Keystone Floor Products Co. v. Beattie Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.