Legal Opinion
Arashiba v. City of Minneapolis
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 26, 2021No. 0:20-cv-00579Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Andrew Arashiba, Civ. No. 20-579 (PAM/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER City of Minneapolis, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated January 21, 2021. The R&R recommends denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend his Complaint (Docket No. 10) for futility. The R&R sets forth the full factual background, and the Court need not revisit it here. In brief, Plaintiff Andrew Arashiba sought permission to amend his Complaint to add two claims and join two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Gordon M. Becker v. University of Nebraska, at OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Todd P. Smith v. Robert CasaliCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.