Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Flores

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 29, 1992No. 91-1040-CRPublished

1DissentNettesheim, P.J.

I disagree with the majority's conclusion that appellate counsel need not obtain court approval to terminate representation of a *283client prior to filing a postconviction motion, notice of appeal or no merit report. I conclude that Flores received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel when counsel terminated her representation of Flores without the approval of the court. Thus, I would reverse the judgment outright and reinstate Flores' right to pursue his postconviction relief.

The majority correctly begins its analysis by observing that the Notice of Intent to Pursue Postconviction Relief…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. MoatsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Dressler v. Circuit Court for Racine CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Whitmore v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. FirkusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API