Legal Opinion

State v. Moats

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1990No. 88-0431-CRPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issue in this case is whether a constitutionally tainted confession may provide the sole basis at a preliminary hearing for binding over for trial a criminally charged defendant. If unconstitutionally obtained evidence is the sole evidence used at the preliminary examination and the defendant is bound over for trial, the purpose of the hearing is not affected. *80We hold that the unconstitutionally obtained confession can be used, as here, at the preliminary examination.

This issue was certified to this court by the court of appeals under sec. 809.61, Stats., and we accepted. Subsequently, by…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. SchaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API