Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Sanford v. Kelly
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 2, 1989No. 2570PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
On October 27, 1988, the relator, Harry A. Sanford, filed a motion in the Court of Common Pleas of Clark County to “compel discovery of witness statements, material evidence and favorable evidence * * * and for continuance of trial.” Sanford alleged that:
“On thé October 10, 1988 pretrial, in chamber, conference in this case, the Clark County Prosecutor indicated that he has not disclosed the statements of the two (2) alleged ‘eyewitnesses’ to the alleged crime and/or the statements of ‘other eyewitnesses.’ Defendant contends, alleges and claims herein that said undisclosed statements are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. SchweikertOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Chillicothe v. KnightOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Yee v. LechnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Franklin Cty. Sheriff's Dept. v. SERBOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.