Legal Opinion

Yee v. Lechner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1989No. E-89-51PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHandwork, P.J.

This matter is before the court as an original action for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner, Steven W. Yee, seeks a writ of mandamus from this court ordering respondent, Gerald Lechner, Chief of Police for the city of Sandusky, to provide petitioner with certain documents pursuant to R.C. 149.43.

R.C. 2731.04 governs the procedural requirements for requesting a writ of mandamus. A petition must be filed “in the name of the state on the relation of the person applying.” R.C. 2731.04. The requirement that the petition be verified by affidavit has been eradicated by Civ. R. 11. State, ex rel.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State, Ex Rel. Millington v. WeirOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Sanford v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Cosmos Broadcasting Corp. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API