Legal Opinion

Plumbers & Pipefitters, National Pension Fund v. Burns

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 4, 2013No. Case No. 3:05CV7393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.

This securities fraud class action arises out of the collapse of the Dana Corporation in late 2005 and early 2006.

I previously certified a class of all persons who purchased Dana stock between April 21, 2004, and October 7, 2005. Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat’l Pension Fund v. Burns, 292 F.R.D. 515 (N.D.Ohio 2013). I reserved ruling on whether: 1) the class could include purchasers of Dana’s bonds; and 2) if so, whether the claims of lead plaintiffs, who purchased only Dana stocks, were typical of the bondholders’ claims. Id., 528-29.

The principal issue…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willis v. Big Lots, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
  2. Första APfonden v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  3. Weiner v. Tivity Health, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API