Legal Opinion
Jeschke v. Lamarr
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1965No. Civ. No. 27750PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ASHBURN, J.*
This action was brought by an assignee for collection on behalf of attorneys Morton B. Harper and William G. Israel, who will be designated herein as plaintiffs or Attorneys. Defendants are Mrs. W. Howard Lee, also known by her professional name, Hedy Lamarr, or Miss Lamarr; also, two corporations wholly owned by her and respectively named Lamarr Productions, Inc. and Donau, Inc.
Plaintiffs herein had represented Miss Lamarr and her corporations and later had sued them, through an assignee for collection, to recover an unpaid balance for attorneys’ fees. That suit—Withers v. Lamarr…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hill v. Matthews Paint Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Calabrese v. Rexall Drug & Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sunniland Fruit, Inc. v. VerniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Sunniland Fruit, Inc. v. VerniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991