Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Averill v. Baird

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.

Proceeding by mandamus. At the hearing a peremptory writ was denied and the alternative writ quashed. Relator appealed.

Relator and S. P. (Sid) Oates were candidates at the primary election August 5, 1924, for nomination on the Democratic Ticket for the office of County Treasurer of Pemiscot county. The Respondent Baird, clerk of the county court called to his assistance Respondents Juden and Bowen, members of the county court of Pemiscot county, and they together canvassed the returns, from which it appeared that on the vote at the primary, omitting absentee votes, relator received 1333 and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hilleman v. FortSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. State ex rel. Doud v. LesueurSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Crow v. Boonville Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Kern v. StoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Lyons v. Bank of ConceptionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hand v. BilyeuMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Hanlon v. City of MaplewoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. State ex rel. Nichols v. SchmouteyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API