Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crow v. Boonville Bridge Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 13, 1907PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Mandamus. (1) The State of Missouri had full right and power to authorize the respondent bridge company to erect and maintain its bridge over the Missouri river. 1. The mere grant to Congress of the power to regulate commerce among the States must not be taken, in all cases, to imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power..

Read the full summary

Mandamus. (1) The State of Missouri had full right and power to authorize the respondent bridge company to erect and maintain its bridge over the Missouri river. 1. The mere grant to Congress of the power to regulate commerce among the States must not be taken, in all cases, to imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power.. Under their reserved powers, the several States may rightfully legislate on matters of a local nature, as, for instance, the regulation of their internal commerce, inspection, quarantine, and health laws, and laws relating to bridges, ferries and highways.…

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the opening of the Boonville railroad bridge for general road travel. The alternative writ recited that the Boonville Railroad Bridge Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Missouri, in December, 1870, for the purpose of constructing and operating a public toll bridge across the Missouri river at Boonville, Missouri, and was to be used for both railroad and ordinary road travel, and that by virtue of its incorporation, it was vested with power and authority to exercise the right of eminent domain necessary to acquire proper terminals…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The People Ex Rel. Millard v. . ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Porter v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Coffman v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. State ex rel. Crandall v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Adair Drainage District v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  5. State Ex Rel. Larsen v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API