Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nichols v. Schmoutey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1967No. 8675PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

L. F. COTTEY, Special Judge.

In form, this is a proceeding in mandamus; but in substance and object it is so clearly an election contest that we wonder at its being brought up in this fashion. It is an old and settled rule that mandamus cannot be employed to accomplish the purpose of an election contest. Barnes v. Gottschalk, 3 Mo.App. 111, 120; State ex rel. and to Use of Averill v. Baird, 217 Mo.App. 362, 278 S.W. 416, 417; State ex rel. Frank v. Becker, 320 Mo. 1087, 9 S.W.2d 153, 154. Worse yet, the case from any standpoint is so lacking in merit that there is no prospect the re*386view we are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Memphis v. HackmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. O'Laughlin v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Sanders v. LacksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Bernhardt v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. Barnes v. GottschalkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API