Legal Opinion
Mt. Airy Insurance v. Millstein
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 31, 1996No. Civil 3:94cv1563 (PCD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff (“Mt. Airy”) seeks a declaratory judgment that defendant Millstein’s (“Mill-stein”) professional liability insurance policy is void ab initio. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND FACTS
On January 3, 1994, Millstein applied to Mt. Airy for professional liability insurance through the Law Offices of Daniel J. Mill-stein. Millstein’s secretary completed the application. Millstein signed it.
Millstein answered “No” to question 19 of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Ryan v. World Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
- State Bank & Trust Co. v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Centennial Life Insurance v. NappiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Westport Ins. Corp. v. GionfriddoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- North American Co for Life & Health Ins v. PounceyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Provident Life and Accident Ins Co v. McKinneyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022