Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Town of Scotland Neck

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 2003No. 49PA03PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAINWRIGHT, Justice.

The issue raised in the present appeal is whether plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence to trigger the narrowly defined Woodson exception to the general exclusivity provisions of the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). See Woodson v. Rowland, 329 N.C. 330, 407 S.E.2d 222 (1991); see also N.C.G.S. § 97-10.1 (2001) (excluding all rights and remedies against employers other than those specifically set forth in the Workers’ Compensation Act). For the reasons set forth below, we hold that plaintiffs did not meet this burden and that the trial court properly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Wiggins v. Pelikan, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Whitaker v. Town of Scotland NeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lennie v. Profile Products, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Estate of Vaughn v. Pike Electric, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Cross v. Capital Transaction Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Zurbriggen v. Twin Hill Acquisition Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Edwards v. GE Lighting Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API