Legal Opinion

Hartigan v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1963No. 43,390PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jackson, J.:

In this workmen’s compensation case, the question involved is whether appellee, who was working in Missouri, is covered by the Kansas Workmen’s Compensation Act when he was injured in Missouri.

This matter depends on whether the contract of employment was made in Kansas. In G. S. 1949, 44-506, it is provided that an employee is covered by the Kansas Workmen’s Compensation Act if the hiring took place in Kansas despite the fact that he suffers injury in another state.

Appellee is a boilermaker and was employed by the Rock Island Transit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Electric Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Evans ex rel. Carnes v. TibbettsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Morrison v. Hurst Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Smith v. McBride & Dehmer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. Neumer v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Clements v. Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API