Legal Opinion

State v. Simmans

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1970No. 69-419PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SchNeidee,, J.

Each.- count of the indictment was framed in the following language, so far as is material to the issue here:

“ .. . Edward N. Simmaiis ... at tlie County of «Ottawa did, by false pretense and with intent to defraud,' procure the signature of another as maker to a check, 'the value of said instrument being $60 or more, to-wit: . . . [a more-specific-description of the offense is here set forth] .. /contrary to- Section 2911.01 of the Revised Code .of Ohio

'• -That section sets forth three separate and distinct.offenses, the- transgression of any one of which constitutes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dillingham v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  2. State v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. HuntsmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. AspellOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SimmansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. State v. CulpOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Midgett v. SheldonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. ToliverOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. CooperHamilton County Municipal Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API