Legal Opinion
State v. Simmans
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1970No. 69-419PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SchNeidee,, J.
Each.- count of the indictment was framed in the following language, so far as is material to the issue here:
“ .. . Edward N. Simmaiis ... at tlie County of «Ottawa did, by false pretense and with intent to defraud,' procure the signature of another as maker to a check, 'the value of said instrument being $60 or more, to-wit: . . . [a more-specific-description of the offense is here set forth] .. /contrary to- Section 2911.01 of the Revised Code .of Ohio
'• -That section sets forth three separate and distinct.offenses, the- transgression of any one of which constitutes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dillingham v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1855
- State v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. HuntsmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. AspellOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SimmansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. CulpOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
- Midgett v. SheldonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. ToliverOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. CooperHamilton County Municipal Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.