Legal Opinion

Benziger Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 4, 1950No. C. D. 1202Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The two protests listed above present for our determination the question of the proper classification of certain imported merchandise which was classified by the collector in protest 143098-K as “Articles embroidered, Comely machine embroidered cotton arts, not wearing apparel,” and in protest 143500-K as “Comely mach. embrd. articles of cotton. Parts of church vestments,” and duty was levied thereon at the rate of 90 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Plaintiff claims the merchandise to he properly dutiable at only 60 per centum ad valorem…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Vietor v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API