Legal Opinion

Morris v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 23, 1997No. 92-590CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The trial of this government contract action was held in Washington, D.C., on March 10-18, 1997. Plaintiffs, Joseph W. Morris and 1120-24 Industrial Partnership, seek re-eision and restitution or, in the alternative, compensatory damages for the alleged breach of a written contract entered into with defendant to purchase a commercial property, comprised of a “garage/warehouse building” situated in the District of Columbia, from the United States Small Business Administration (SBA). The contract at issue was formed upon the SBA’s acceptance…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Becho, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. United Enterprise & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Price v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Centerra Security Services Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API