Legal Opinion
Gross v. Frank
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 6, 1923No. 2034PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the validity of claim 3 of patent No. 1,380,058, dated May 3*1, 1921, granted to the appellant, Gross, for a parking light for automobiles.
The appellant, hereinafter called the plaintiff, on the 4th day of August, 1920, filed his application to have issued to him a patent for certain new and useful improvements in parking lights for automobiles, claimed to have been invented by him. The patent was duly granted, claim 3, the subject of the litigation, being an amendment and enlargement of claims 1 and 2 of the petition for patent. jThe District Court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- O'Rourke Engineering Const. Co. v. McMullenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gross v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Gross v. NorrisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
- Rancourt v. Panco Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Smithey v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
- Six-Way Corp. v. McCurdy & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935