Legal Opinion

LUTHERNA BROTH. v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1992No. 6-91-091-CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Lutheran Brotherhood and others, plaintiffs below, appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment in their suit against Kidder Peabody & Company, defendant below. The suit was based on allegations that Kidder sold worthless bonds to plaintiffs by negligently and deliberately making misrepresentations of material facts. Because we find that the summary judgment evidence raises genuine fact questions on the issues of misrepresentations, knowledge, and reliance, we reverse the summary judgment and remand the cause for trial.

THE ISSUES

Although the defendant raises…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling InterestsTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rubinstein v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Weatherly v. Deloitte & Touche, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  4. In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
  5. Tracker Marine, L.P. v. Ogle, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API