Legal Opinion

Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. City of Petaluma

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 2022No. A163192Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/14/22; certified for publication 12/13/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SAVE NORTH PETALUMA RIVER AND WETLANDS et al., Petitioners and Appellants, A163192 v. (Sonoma County CITY OF PETALUMA et al., Super. Ct. No. SCV-266157) Respondents, J. CYRIL JOHNSON INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Respondent and Real Party in Interest. This is a mandate proceeding to review an agency’s decision for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.1) At issue is the decision of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sierra Club v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API