Miller v. Houston City St. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United Stales for the Eastern District of Tesáis.
1Opinion of the Court
LOOK®, District Judge,
(sifter stating the facts as above.) Tills cause having been ivied without a jury by a, siipul.3J.I0n of paxileo under section 7CO, of Boy. B>t, the ridings of the court, duly presented by si bill of exceptions, may be reviewed, and, were there a special finding of facts by the court, the review might extend to the determination of the sufficiency oí file facts found to support the judgment. Miller v. Insurance Co., 12 Wall. 285. In this case the judgment was a simple finding for the defendant, as appears from the record, in the following words:
‘Anti now, upon due…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Miller v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Myers v. MeinrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Railroad Co. v. DurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mining Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lahman v. Burnes Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Reaves v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Mundt v. Commercial National Bank of OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- American Nat. Bank v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
- Tobias v. Wolverine Min. Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.