Mundt v. Commercial National Bank of Ogden
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Second District. Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by Herman Mundt against the Commercial National Bank of -Ogden to compel tbe transfer of stock. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBrick, J.
This is an action in equity to compel the transfer of stock. Despondent in his complaint, after stating the corporate capacity and the business of appellant, in substance, alleged that on a day named, for a valuable consideration, he pur*92chased and then became, and at the time of the commencement of the action was, the owner and holder of ten shares of the capital stock of the appellant, evidenced by certificate No. 220, which had been duly issued by appellant to one George Dawson, and had by him been sold, assigned, and delivered to respondent; that respondent, before bringing this action,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnston v. LaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Holbrook v. . New Jersey Zinc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- In re KlausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Helm v. SwiggettIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Miller v. Houston City St. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. RoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Baglin v. Earl-Eagle Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
- Holmes v. Birtman Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Brown v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Gorham v. Massillon Iron & Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.