Legal Opinion

State v. Driggers

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 8, 1910No. 7427PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Before Gary, J., Clarendon, Indictment against J. Frank Driggers for murder of Mamie Boseman. Defendant appeals from sentence. cite: Extent of inquiry in insanity: 9 Fncy., 717, 718. Improper remarks by trial Judge: 81 S. C., 379; 73 S. C., 383; 80 S. C., 383. Charging requests: 39 S. C., 108; 33 S. C., 117; 32 S. C., 43.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The defendant, J. Frank Driggers, was convicted of the murder of his sister, Mrs. Boseman. As the verdict embraced a recommendation to mercy, the Court imposed a sentence of life imprisonment. There is no need to set out the evidence in its revolting details, for the questions made by the appeal will be sufficiently clear from a very brief statement of the undisputed facts. The defendant and his sister, Mrs. Boseman, previous to the homicide, had quarrelled about the balance claimed by Mrs. Boseman to be due her on a trade of a horse…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. McLeary v. . NormentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. State v. ThrailkillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Latimer v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. People v. . NinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State v. BighamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Powers v. RawlsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Lusk v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API