Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 7, 1911No. 7753PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Before SsasU, J., Sumter, October, 1909. Indictment against E. A. Jackson for obtaining money under false pretenses. Defendant appeals from sentence. Oral argument by Mr. Clifton. cites: Insmity is an affirmative plea: 10 Ency. P. & P. 1215; 92 Mo. 300. Instruction as to degree of insanity correct: 39 S. C. 109.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The defendant E. A. Jackson was convicted and sentenced under an indictment which charged that he, “devising and intending to cheat and defraud J. H. Cunningham of his goods, moneys, chattels and property, unlawfully, knowingly and designedly, did falsely pretend that he, the said E. A. Jackson, then and there had a car of lumber containing nine thousand feet of two by ten by twenty-four lumber of the value of eighty-six dollars, which said pretense the said E. A. Jackson then and there well knew tO‘ be false, by color and means of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Latimer v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  2. State v. DriggersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  4. State v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  5. Alexander v. MeroneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. State v. GaskinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Powers v. RawlsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API