Legal Opinion

Killgore v. Killgore

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1963No. 9307PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

This cause was previously before this court, In re Killgore’s Estate, 84 Idaho 226, 370 P.2d 512. On that appeal we held that the defendant (respondent here), proponent of a lost will, was not rendered incompetent to testify as one of the two “credible witnesses” required by I.C. § 15-231, to prove the provisions of the lost will, by the fact that she was a beneficiary under the will. After the remand in that case, the cause was tried to a jury on two issues :

“1. Was the will in question revoked by Mr. Killgore prior to his death?
“2. If the will was not revoked, have the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McElroy v. Phink, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Estate of ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Watenpaugh v. State Teacher's Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Crenshaw v. CrenshawIdaho Supreme Court · 1948

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API