Legal Opinion

City of Lakewood v. Pierce County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 4, 2001No. 25010-1-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alexander, J.*

The Thurston County Superior Court granted summary judgment to Pierce County, holding that the City of Lakewood may not require the County to enter into a franchise agreement to operate sewer lines and facilities under Lakewood’s streets and that Lakewood may not charge the County a fee for such franchise in excess of Lakewood’s administrative costs. We affirm.

PACTS

Pierce County operates a regional sanitary sewer system under the authority of chapter 36.94 RCW. Before the City of Lakewood incorporated in 1996, the County installed sewer lines under the public streets and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ruff v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Parkland Light & Water Co. v. Tacoma-Pierce County Board of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. City of Lakewood v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. The Cooper Point Ass'n v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API